Nov 17

photo of brighton beach

Blogging has become a luxury of late – I meant to do ALT-C 2011 but never did. (Videos are now available by the way.) So, I have decided to blog ECEL more or less immediately while it’s still fresh and because I know some of this is relevant to colleagues. Of necessity, it will be rough around the edges but hopefully of some use. To speed the process I will make use of my tweets and the ecel2011 hashtag.

I enjoyed the conference this year because it seemed to hit a few more spots than in previous years. It also helped that my session was fairly well attended despite being scheduled in a track (Games) that I would not have chosen, being the last one of the final day and following an empty slot (presenter took ill). Note to sceptics – Second Life is still alive and well on the conference circuit.

Now to the practicalities. Donald Clark keynoted first and more or less repeated his ‘Do not lecture me’ lecture from ALT-C a year or so ago. He has some good things to say but a lot of it is negated by the hectoring style and apparent failure to recognise that the practices he is so determined to denigrate are probably not as prevalent as he thinks – at least not amongst the delegates at an elearning conference. For those unfamiliar with Donald, see his ALT-C 2010 video. See also his blog.

An early session that left an impression was on the use of wikiversity and other open channels by Estonian academic Kaido Kikkas, who according to my tweet (quoting him more or less), ‘…has a special contract with Tallin university to publish all his course resources as #oer‘. The same academic also mentioned in passing that he reads 300 blogs once a week in order to facilitate one of his open courses. When asked for an example of an English medium course (most of his are in Estonian for obvious reasons) he gave us this example Ethics and Law in New Media. Looks like a useful structure.

At the end of the first day I attended a couple of sessions on e-submission more out of duty than anything else but they proved useful not least for highlighting potential alternatives to Turnitin/Grademark  – University of West of England have developed their own system which can be used offline and which is fully integrated with the student record system – details on their website. Sheffield Hallam have something similar apparently (will check it out when I get a chance). These are for Blackboard but similar Moodle tools are out there or in the pipeline. Some very valid points were made about the limitations of Turnitin and why we do well to keep alternatives in mind.

I had a conversation on the bus with Amanda Sykes from Glasgow university who was enthusing about Peerwise a student MCQ sharing & rating system which she has used very successfully with veterinary and biology students. Unfortunately her presentation clashed with mine but the paper ‘PeerWise – The Marmite of Veterinary Student Learning’ looks well worth a read. (Abstracts and information on how to request access to papers will appear on the conference website in due course I believe.) Amanda also recommended Aropa a peer assessment tool developed at Glasgow and a potential alternative to Turnitin’s Peermark.

Grainne Conole’s keynote on the second day was a whirlwind tour of the current elearning landscape. One useful reference noted was: Educause ‘ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2011 Report. Another was to her blog where she has been posting draft chapters of her new book Conole, G. (forthcoming), Designing for learning in an Open World, New York: Springer.

A third keynote by Anne Boddington, Dean of Arts, University of Brighton urged us to resist the dehumanising effects of technology and value the visceral – a helpful counter balance to the technology laden programme though my experience at the breakout following which was standing room only and very cramped was possibly not the kind of visceral experience she had in mind.

A final goody that I detected via the Twitter stream after I had left the conference is this slideshare  Putting Things in Context – Designing Social Media for Education by Jon Dron, Terry Anderson and George Siemens of Athabasca. Must read the associated paper.

This highly selective account of ECEL 2011 does not do justice to the wealth of contributions and may appear very pragmatic and superficial given the research focus of the conference but I hope it gives a flavour and will be of some value to colleagues with pressing learning technology issues at the ‘coalface’.

 

 

Jun 24

I attended MaharaUK11 yesterday and tweeted quite prolifically so am now attempting to collate these into a blog. I am a relative newcomer to e-portfolios and have no strong commitment either way but one thing was clear yesterday -  Mahara is alive and well in a variety of educational contexts so the views of Martin Weller and Donald Taylor and others on the demise of e-portfolios are not the whole story.

Back to the tweet narrative:

The New Zealand Connection

Mahara (Maori word for thinking) originated in New Zealand and still has strong influences from there. Most of key developers, some of whom were at the conference, are from NZ. The opening keynote was by Mark Osborne  a secondary school teacher in NZ http://prezi.com/dubgzzefzioj/maharauk-open-for-learning/ who is using Mahara extensively with his students for individual and group work. He also uses it himself for CPD – something that several of the other presenters also highlighted.

Mahara and Moodle

Most schools/colleges/universities in the UK are using Mahara with Moodle though some, like us, are using a standalone version for smallscale projects. At some institutions the use of Mahara for communications and collaborative activity seems to be taking over from equivalent VLE tools. Phil Butler from ULCC (host Moodle/Mahara for many FE/HEIs) has stats to support. His presentation will appear in due course on the MaharaUK11 site.

Case studies of note

Nottingham university used Mahara with Bioscience students on summer placement. It helped coordinate communications between staff and students which has been difficult and inefficient in the past. It also helped students keep in touch with each other and provide support to those who were struggling etc. Employers also got engaged in the process.

University of Kent piloted Mahara this academic year after using Pebblepad for 3 years on limited basis. One consideration was cost. They are moving towards full implementation within Moodle from 2011/12. As well as using it with current students, they also plan to use it to develop alumni engagement.

Southampton Solent (SSU) have been using Mahara for a couple of years and are a bit of a leader in the field in my view. Media students have started using Mahara for showcasing their work – previously they had to learn Dreamweaver. We were shown some very impressive CVs by  students in journalism and other media related subjects.

Lifelong learning Don Presant who represents a Manitoban community career development network makes great use of Mahara. See link: http://careerportfolio.mb.ca for examples of use. See also a .pdf of his presentation on proceedings site http://maharauk.org/mod/resource/view.php?id=76

Don also drew attention to e-folio Minnesota http://www.efoliominnesota.com/ and Careers Wales http://www.careerswales.com/ as great examples of life long learning networks which offer the general public an e-portfolio for life (not sure what platform they’re based on). Careers Wales has 400,000 users apparently.

A range of plugins were demonstrated by Geoffrey Rowland from Yeovil College e.g. CPD to enable staff to record time spent on courses et al. FE staff are required to formally document 30 hours of CPD per year so this is very useful in that context but no doubt could apply elsewhere. He also demo’d chemistry teaching and mind mapping tools (will add links when/if I find them).

Conclusion

It was a useful day even if it poses more questions than answers for me, the most pressing being ‘Where do we go from here?’ I won’t begin to bore the blogosphere with our internal dilemmas.

May 12

I attended the London Blackboard User Group at the College of Law yesterday. It was housed in a very nice building in Moorgate and was an interesting trip into the city for a number of attendees. The event was entitled ‘Making the most of what you’ve got’ and was designed to showcase powerlinks and building block for those using Blackboard Classic or CE Vista who do not yet want to make the move to Blackboard 9.

In the CE Vista session we covered two different powerlinks, one for Txttools and one for the learning object repository Equella. If we had got any further with our use / installation of Learning Objects, it might have been useful for us to show that to the group.

Txttools

Stephen Vickers from the University of Edinburgh presented on the edutxt powerlink he has developed for the text messaging system Txttools.  Stephen has developed a number of different powerlinks available from his SPV Software site.

The current version of this powerlink enables a course leader/instructor to send a text message to the students in their module via the VLE. Students are requested to insert their mobile phone number in the user profile of the VLE and it is from there that the powerlink collects the information. As UEL has a txttools account, it looks very much like a Powerlink worth investigating as it would enable staff members to send text messages to a specific module cohort or group within it.

Further developments are being made to the powerlink to enable a polling option to be set up. Students could text a key word and their answer to enter into a poll. A very useful option for users who do not have access to lecture voting kits.

A couple of questions that arise for UEL would be how the credits system would work. We have to pay for every message sent, so some form of agreement would have to be made as to acceptable use for academic schools. Also, we would need to investigate whether the mobile phone data we hold on the student records system could be integrated into the VLE to enable us to contact the students without them having to submit their mobile phone number.

Equella

Jonathan Blatchford from Imperial presented on their use of the learning objects repository Equella and the Web CT integration. The aim of the integration is to enable a user to seamlessly access the repository without logging into an additional system. There were a few issues noted with the PowerLink e.g. being unable to view an Equella resource in Student View.

 An interesting use of a repository system, but at the moment, the level of use of Equella was lower than had been hoped. An interesting point noted was that after the release of the repository system, the IPR and copyright concerns of staff were increased even though the issues are the same as those faced with using the VLE.

 

A couple of other interesting points out of the day were:

  • The LERSIG (Learning Environment Review Special Interest Group) is an interesting group formed out of ALT for those institutions planning on reviewing their learning environments.
  • There was a request for those institutions considering or undertaking a review of their VLE to share their approaches / matrix of questions with the rest of the group. This could be very useful to ensure we all aren’t reinventing the wheel… again!
May 12

The UELconnect 1 year on event earlier this week had a number of interesting presentations throughout the day. It was interesting to hear the new VC (Patrick McGhee) talk about his interests in technology and the use of lecture capture technology. Interest in the use of such tools is growing and having the appropriate infrastructure to support this interest is very much needed.

One thing that occurred to me during the day was how much I learnt from the presentations I saw. It was really useful to have academics from across the university giving their views on different projects we have undertaken. What I think is an interesting and crucial challenge for us is to capture and disseminate this good practice and innovative approaches throughout the university. Given the fact I work in the e-learning team and I didn’t know about a number of the projects presented on, I wonder how those out in the schools and services have any idea what is happening in other schools.

In the recently released JISC Portfolio for Senior Managers one of the key ways noted for enhancing the student and staff experience was ‘Ensure that best practice and innovation is being shared across your institution rather than being confined to pockets of excellence’. I think this is going to be an interesting, but crucial challenge for us.

May 12

We recently undertook a survey of the e-learning staff development requirements of staff. In all, the survey was completed by over 200 members of staff from a variety of schools & services. The survey asked for people thoughts on the University VLE (UEL Plus) and a range of learning technologies (Wikis, Blogs, Podcasts , Videocast , Virtual Worlds , Image sharing, Social Bookmarking, Video/audio conferencing , Chat , Microblogging, Online games  and Social networking). The survey also asked for preferences for support mechanisms when they require immediate support and longer term training on learning technologies.

Further analysis of the results is being undertaken at the moment, but some brief highlights are as below.

  • Approximately 75% of all staff surveyed use UEL Plus in their current work.
  • Of the different technologies we requested information, the highest used for work within UEL were Wikis, Blog, Podcasts and Video/Audio Conferencing. Each technology had between 10-15% of people stating ‘I have used/use this technology within my work at UEL’.
  • Of all of the learning technologies mentioned, over 90% of people had heard of the majority of technologies, even if they had never used them. The technology most people had never heard of was Social Bookmarking e.g. Del.icio.us (with 31% having never heard of the tool).
  • When asked to state their level of enthusiasm on the use of learning technologies, 78% stated their enthusiasm was 7 or over (on a scale of 1-10) however only 52% believed UEL Plus to be rated 7 or over for their overall opinion of the tool.
  • Of the current e-learning support mechanisms used, the most common form of support staff draw upon is the help of colleagues (26%) within their schools or services.
  • When asked for preferred methods of short term/immediate support Over 90% stated they would go to a colleague frequently or occasionally. This was closely followed by online FAQs (88%) and support from LTAs (83%).
  • When asked for support methods for learning a new tool / substantial information, hands on workshops (92%) and support from colleagues (92%) were the most likely to be used. Of the least preferred methods support from students (66%) and video recordings of previous sessions (51%) were highlighted as methods staff would never use.
  • With regards to style of workshop delivery, 62% of people would prefer a face to face session, 7% would prefer an online session and 31% would have no specific preference.

This staff development survey highlights some interesting results, which will feed into the redevelopment of the provision. Trials in virtual classroom tools are currently being undertaken along with a much needed review of the support documentation we have for UEL Plus.

May 12

After an interesting 6 months working with the UEL Employability Team, we have recently launched a learning resource called ‘Get That Job! Four steps to successful employment’.

It was a really interesting project to work on from many angles:

  • We were involved in some very interesting filming sessions with employers in Canary Wharf. Very interesting and influential people who gave up their time to share their tips and experiences on gaining successful graduate employment.
  • We filmed some successful student/graduate experiences at UEL. As my job isn’t very student facing, it was interesting to see what opportunities our students & graduate have and what successes they have achieved.
  • As a result of this project, some very useful discussions on the role/status of open educational resources in UEL were undertaken. As OER becomes more important in UK HE, it will be interesting to see how this is taken forward in the university.
  • We have developed some interesting flash interactions to support students to ‘Test Yourself’ on different aspects of applying and getting jobs.

Working with the Employability Team has been very interesting, working with colleagues who have such an interest and passion in their work, made the creation of this learning resource enjoyable. Hopefully, with more funding we will be able to grow this resource even further.

Now – I guess after working on an employability project for 6 months, I should look at updating that CV!!

Apr 20

Following on from Matt Lingard’s Twitter eye view of  Grainne Conole’s keynote this morning at Moodlemoot 2011, I will be entirely unoriginal and try to do an abbreviated version of  the subsequent twitterstream from a limited and highly selective perspective.

I note much excitement and interest plus a few cautionary notes  in relation to University of Kent’s WebCT/Moodle migration tool documented here I believe http://t.co/p1dkxP8 (sorry no time to check this out).

There has been interest too in MMU’s migration to Moodle with a link to their staff blogs http://lrt.mmu.ac.uk/staff-blogs/ I am still hoping for a corrected link to the LT review page – now supplied see comments on main blog.

Another highlight for me (I don’t get out much) has been the link to the very useful looking  Screensteps tool for ‘Screen capture, image editing and document authoring in a single application’. Will be taking advantage of the 14day free trial.

And this post would not be complete without a reference to the  ’squirrel of death’ – Moodle’s answer to the Blackboard ‘rabbit warren’ of nested folders.  This hitherto unknown creature first made an appearance at the M25LT group a few weeks ago but I think we haven’t seen the last of her/him/it.

That’s me for Moodlemoot 2011 today – I hope my colleagues and twitter friends will continue to keep me posted.

Mar 16

I am posting occasionally on a more personal blog on posterous during CCK11

Jan 21

I signed up for Connectivism and Connective Knowledge 2011 and have had little time to spend on it but have just listened to the Elluminate session from yesterday evening. Keeping the alliteration going I think I can say I am in a state of Confusion about Connectivism but that is apparently good at this stage (or any stage) in this course or in any learning situation from here on in.

Oct 07

I attended FOTE (footie) again this year, having enjoyed last year’s as much for the Twitter interaction and  conversations with  other participants as the formal presentations.  This year’s was a very similar experience with record use of Twitter and presentations  ranging from Microsoft’s vision of a future world of beautiful people with technology to guide their every move,  to Matt Lingard’s very grounded look at staff take up (or not ) of technology and  Miles Metcalfe’s cynical take on our uncritical love of technology, not to mention other offerings on augmented reality, mobile learning and educational gaming. In other words, something for everyone – or the geeks anyway.

As well as the range of technology being presented there was also considerable variety in how it was broadcast and recorded. All sessions were streamed into Second Life and via livestream, tweets are archived here, and a very neat tool Visible tweets provided a visual display of  indvidual tweets as they arrived (between presentations). There’s a Flickr photostream and Chris Smith has provided an interesting video record of attending the conference remotely from Thailand http://screenr.com/E04. Video recordings of all keynotes are gradually appearing on the conference website.

The blogs below from presenters and others will give you a flavour of the actual presentations. Take a few minutes to look at the Microsoft Surface parody video in Matt Lingard’s blog – he used it to great effect even though  it froze half way through on both attempts to run it. Another notable aspect of Matt’s presentation which will become apparent from the blog is the level of audience interaction he achieved.

Matt Lingard

Ollie Bray

Brian Kelly

JISC RSC Wales

This is a good event to participate in, however you do it, and it’s free – watch out for next year’s publicity and sign up quickly.  Best quote of the day (or possibly paraphrase)  from Jeremy Speller’s presentation (see link below):  “Mobile learning is not new – books have been moving for long time”.

Some links relating to talks:

Augmented Reality
http://www.learnar.org/

Jeremy Speller’s presentation on mobile university
http://www.slideshare.net/jeremyspeller/the-mobile-university-last-years-model

Other useful stuff that came up:

JISC legal guidance on audio recordings
http://www.jisclegal.ac.uk/ManageContent/ViewDetail/tabid/243/ID/1608/Recording-Lectures-Legal-Considerations-28072010.aspx

Open university podcasts (more comprehensive than iTunesU)
http://podcast.open.ac.uk/

Microsoft Surface Parody (see Matt Lingard’s post)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZrr7AZ9nCY

Free tool for online meetings
Flash meeting

Audience polling system used very effectively by Matt Lingard – see his post above for more details.
http://www.polleverywhere.com/

Possible alternative to Prezi – an extension to PowerPoint used by speaker from Microsoft
Powerpoint plex

preload preload preload
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats